Sources & downloads

Check the evidence.

Definitions, source links and the files behind the benchmark. No registration required.

Snapshot retrieved 14 September 2026 · Data years 2024–2025 · UTF-8 CSV, one row per country and metric

Official survey statistics · 2024 and 2025

Eurostat: artificial intelligence in enterprises

The enterprise survey provides AI use by company size and technology. This release uses the published total activity category C10-S951_X_K and enterprises with 10 or more people unless a size breakdown is stated. The survey covers selected business activities; it excludes the financial sector and does not describe every employer or the public sector. Technology categories overlap. An enterprise can use more than one type of AI.

Open primary source ↗
Official labour-force statistics · 2024 and 2025

Eurostat: ICT specialists in employment

People whose main job involves developing, operating or maintaining ICT systems. Share of total employment and thousands of persons are separate series. These figures cover a much wider workforce than AI specialists. We retain source status flags, including estimates, breaks in series and low reliability where supplied.

Open primary source ↗
Government-commissioned sector estimate · reference year 2024

UK DSIT: Artificial Intelligence sector study 2024

Table 3.3 reports an estimated 86,139 AI-related employees in the UK sector. This is a modelled sector measure using company data and survey evidence, not a census of people with AI skills. The sector includes dedicated and diversified AI companies. Its definition differs from ICT employment and it is kept outside the cross-country score.

Open primary source ↗
Methodology · source reviewed 14 September 2026

OECD.AI: LinkedIn data methodology

LinkedIn AI-talent measures use member profiles and platform coverage. Their denominator is not a national workforce census. We use this source to explain why AI profile counts from different providers should not be merged into one ranking. No LinkedIn country values are included in the downloadable dataset.

Open primary source ↗
Research context · published 28 October 2025

European Commission: shaping and strengthening European AI talent

The Commission-hosted report discusses the supply, attraction and retention of AI talent, with evidence that often predates its publication. It informs the distinction between specialist roles and wider AI skills. Its narrative findings are not numerical inputs to the market score.

Open primary source ↗
Voluntary framework · 2023

NIST: AI Risk Management Framework 1.0

The role guides draw on the framework’s treatment of governance, context, measurement and management of AI risk. Our four maturity levels and suggested work samples are an original synthesis for discussion. NIST does not endorse, validate or provide these role levels.

Open primary source ↗
Digital competence framework · published 27 November 2025

European Commission JRC: DigComp 3.0

DigComp 3.0 integrates AI into digital competence. We use it as background for AI literacy and learning practice. Our professional role guides are not the DigComp framework, its official proficiency levels or a certification.

Open primary source ↗

Raw source snapshots

These files preserve the public Eurostat JSON-stat responses used for this release. They include more series than the benchmark displays. Eurostat timestamps and status codes are retained.

What is measured, calculated or proposed?

Published observations: Eurostat survey values. They are statistical estimates even when not explicitly flagged “e”. Source estimates: values explicitly flagged by the source, plus the UK sector study. Calculated: the readiness proxy and percentage-point changes. Scenario estimates: mechanical adoption extrapolations. Proposed: role levels, work samples and self-check actions.

Reuse and attribution

Credit the original data providers and this benchmark when reusing the derived figures. Original provider terms continue to apply. Consult Eurostat’s copyright and reuse policy for its data, and the licence stated on other source pages. Do not imply that Eurostat, NIST, OECD or the European Commission endorses this benchmark.

Source selection

We prioritised open, comparable primary-source series with explicit definitions. Unsourced talent counts and opaque commercial rankings were not used in the country score. Salary evidence is separately sourced below. OECD and Commission research provide context; only the specified Eurostat indicators enter the score.

Read the full method and limitations →

Salary sources

Figures checked on 14 September 2026. Full reports remain with their publishers.

Unionen

2025. Member salary statistics; range covers the middle 80%. Monthly figures are annualised by multiplying by 12. Role sample size not published on the open page.

Read the source ↗

IT Jobs Watch

6 months to 14 September 2026. Salaries quoted in permanent job advertisements. Range is the 25th–75th percentile. 47 quoted salaries; 81 matching permanent vacancies.

Read the source ↗

DevITjobs European report

2025 report. Employer-supplied salary ranges from more than 23,000 listings across the full report. Values below are published category means, not individual job-title medians. Gross annual pay excludes stock and bonuses. Country-by-category sample sizes and the exact collection window are not stated in the cited charts.

Read the source ↗

Realtime Recruitment

2026 guide. Recruiter guide estimates for permanent roles, with experience bands. These are guidance ranges, not percentiles. The table separates salary from contractor day rates. Role sample sizes and a statistical estimation method are not supplied in the cited table. The table does not explicitly define bonus treatment; confirm with the provider.

Read the source ↗

Robert Half France

2026 guide. Starting gross annual fixed pay excluding bonuses and benefits. Range is the published 25th–75th percentile. Role sample size not published on the open page.

Read the source ↗

Talent-management framework sources

CIPD: Talent management · Workforce planning · Succession planning

These inform the assessment’s scope. The questions, four-stage mapping and conservative scoring rule are this site’s proposed framework, not a CIPD test.